Project detail

jedan (One, 2011)

A short relationship drama and an early marker of collaboration between Umjetnost za sve, Aning Film, and international co-production partners.

Archive state: this page uses verified internal-source claims and functions as a reference record for future project entries.

Content and context

Audience at a film screening, representing festival and cinema circulation.
Early production cycleThe film belongs to the period that defined Matija Radeljak’s authorial and production roles.

The project is documented as a short drama adapted from Soba za razbijanje, with an emphasis on emotional and spatial minimalism. In the archive narrative, it marks a transition from experimentation toward more stable co-production structures.

Metadata

  • Year: 2011
  • Type: Short fiction film
  • Matija Radeljak role: director and screenwriter
  • Production lane: Aning Film
  • Co-production trace: Umjetnost za sve, Partizanka

Process and impact

  1. Development - adaptation of an intimate dramatic structure for a short format and compact crew.
  2. Production - alignment of authorial direction with early co-production practice.
  3. Visibility - festival circulation positioned the film among notable early works.
Back to project archive

Project context

Within the archive, jedan serves as a reference point for an early phase of collaboration between authorial direction and organizational production practice. Its importance lies in demonstrating how creative choices, production discipline, and partner coordination can be aligned under compact conditions. This record therefore goes beyond a film synopsis and functions as process evidence for later, more complex project cycles. It helps readers understand how foundational work can shape institutional and collaborative trajectories over time.

Production model

The production model in this case relies on clearly split roles, short communication chains, and careful resource discipline. That structure made it possible to preserve authorial consistency while maintaining reliable coordination between participating partners. In archival terms, the model matters because it shows how a small team can sustain process quality without abandoning artistic focus. The documented choices also provide reusable guidance for subsequent projects operating under similar constraints.

Circulation and impact

The project circulation demonstrates how early work can open visibility and future partnerships even when initial production scope is limited. Its impact is visible in the way it helped establish operational credibility for the team and supported access to later co-production contexts with higher complexity. For that reason, the archive tracks not only artistic output but also the institutional trace the project left in subsequent program development. The page is intended as a durable reference for that transition.